Bill loves Robin; gender matters; lifestyle diseases; political economy; who reads blogs?; top mimics; land grab showdown: links I liked

September 27, 2011

Why are over 3 million people campaigning on violence against women in South Asia?

September 27, 2011

Good news on aid: dependency is falling, and quality (slowly) improving (but France is still rubbish)

September 27, 2011
empty image
empty image

Real Aid: Ending Aid Dependency is a smart new aid-report-with-a-difference from ActionAid:

“There is good news. Developing countries are getting less dependent on aid. Over the last decade [aid dependency] has fallen on average by a third in the poorest countries. In Ghana aid dependency fell from 47% to 27%, in Mozambique from 74% to 58% and in Vietnam from 22% to 13%. Although aid levels increased, economic growth and the countries’ ability to mobilise their own resources increased faster.

Aid dependency

For Rwanda, real aid has helped transform the country. Aid as a percentage of government spending dropped from 85% in 2000 to 45% in 2010. “We have shown donors that when we are in the driving seat – deciding how to allocate aid money ourselves – we spend donor money more effectively. Donors have responded to the results we have delivered by giving us more and more say over how we use their aid,” Ronald Nkusi, Director of the External Finance Unit in the Finance Ministry, Rwanda.

To ensure aid helps to reduce their dependency on it, developing countries are implementing systems to hold donors accountable. In Rwanda a traffic light system scores donors on factors such as how much they use the country’s own finance systems, and use of budget support for procurement and governance. Developing country governments are also becoming more accountable to their own people, rather than donors. In Ghana ActionAid supports a community in the village of Mampehia to track the school budget, which is financed out of Ghana’s national budget, which in turn is substantially boosted by budget support aid.

Another key factor in the improving situation is that many countries have boosted their tax revenue by between 4 and 8% of GNI in recent years. Donors can support this process by giving more real aid, which allows developing countries to make their own decisions. In Ghana donors have pooled a third of all aid to the country in a flexible programme which reduced the cost of mobilising resources.

Donors can also be transparent and accountable themselves, by publishing details of their work in an internationally agreed form, and they can give aid which supports domestic resource mobilisation. In a very clear example, aid from the UK supported Rwanda to quadruple its own taxes between 1998 and 2006.”

The report examines the way success stories such as South Korea, Botswana and Taiwan used aid to achieve economic take off, and in turn reduce their aid dependence, and sees similar approaches working now (assertive recipient governments with a clear national strategy, making aid donors fall into line rather than impose the latest developmental fads).

It then goes on to rank the aid quality of different donors, estimating how much of their spend constitutes what ActionAid calls ‘real’ (i.e. good quality) aid. Ireland and the UK come out top, with Greece and France at the bottom of the class. Here’s where the ‘bad aid’ goes:Bad Aid breakdown

Overall, hats off to AA for the focus on improving aid quality, positive message, and acknowledgement that reducing aid dependency is a vital task (and one that aid itself should aim to facilitate). [h/t Jonathan Tench]

2 comments

  1. Really informative. Aid will become productive when the locals are involved in deciding what best suites them for progressive growth

  2. Saying that “France is still rubbish” is misleading at best.

    From the report:
    “Debt cancellation has been a vital weapon in the fight against poverty, removing a huge burden from the backs of the world’s poor. Much of it cancels payments
    which countries are making, allowing them to spend much more of their own money on health, education and other key
    social sectors.”

    “Almost all 2009 [debt] relief came from France – to its former colonies such as Côte d’Ivoire and Cameroon – so France is the donor that incurs a significant substandard aid score in this category.”

    Now, you might point out that the authors also highlight that some cancelled debts were not being paid. However, the report does not make a distinction between debts that were being paid versus those that were not, and instead lumps all debt relief as ‘substandard aid.’ This is a questionable definition in my opinion, and one that throws doubt on your assertion that “France is still rubbish.”

Leave a comment