What happens if you combine life expectancy and GDP into a single indicator? (You spend more on health)

January 29, 2014

Can aid donors really ‘think and work politically’? Plus the dangers of ‘big man’ thinking, and the horrors of political science-speak

January 29, 2014

The end of North-South, in one graph

January 29, 2014
empty image
empty image

Two important findings from the latest Branko Milanovic (with Christoph Lakner) World Bank paper on global income distribution.

First , it had previously been thought that, due to the rise of China, the global Gini was falling – i.e. if you took the global population as a whole, inequality was falling. Turns out this may not be true due to under-reporting of top incomes (can’t think why that happens). ‘With such an adjustment the downward trend in the Gini almost disappears’. Oops.

Second the paper gives a lovely graphic demonstration of ‘the end of North South’. In 1988 the global distribution was twin peaked – the peaks corresponding broadly to a rich North and poor South. Since then growth in emerging economies, and stagnation for all but the richest in the rich world, has obliterated the valley between the peaks (see graph).

global distribution of income 1988-2008

“The “winners” were country-deciles that in 1988 were around the median of the global income distribution, 90 percent of whom in terms of population are from Asia. The “losers” were the country-deciles that in 1988 were around the 85th percentile of the global income distribution, almost 90 percent of whom in terms of population are from mature economies.”

One other titbit:

“Most of global inequality is accounted for by differences between countries, although this contribution has declined over time, suggesting that countries have become more similar. The within-country component of global inequality, however, has increased continuously over this twenty-year period.”

So there you have it, just as the North-South divide starts to fade, the divides within countries kick in to maintain the overall level of global economic unfairness.

4 comments

  1. Hi Duncan, thanks for this. I think that it gives clarity to what is happening wit inequality between countries and at the same time provides clarity about the role played by the market and the global institutions in defining policies that might reduce poverty. We have to work on them!

    Costa

  2. Dear Duncan/ Readers

    Kindly help me understand the Y Axis please. I dont think I quite understand the term “Density of Log Income”

    Please help

    1. It’s the chunk of the population that is earning that particular income, but I hope someone more statistically literate than me can explain it properly!

Leave a comment