<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Governance leads to bad land deals – the link between politics and land grabs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/bad-governance-leads-to-bad-land-deals-the-link-between-politics-and-land-grabs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/bad-governance-leads-to-bad-land-deals-the-link-between-politics-and-land-grabs/</link>
	<description>How active citizens and effective states can change the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 20:52:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilario Rea</title>
		<link>https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/bad-governance-leads-to-bad-land-deals-the-link-between-politics-and-land-grabs/#comment-4844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ilario Rea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=13636#comment-4844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From my personal experience I can say that &quot;large scale land acquisitions&quot; are surely related to weak democratic institutions that lead to corruption without protecting the local communities’ rights on land from which they belong. Despite advances in democratization around the world, huge deficits of transparency, accountability, and popular empowerment exist and contribute to elite capture of resources.

- In addition, another determining element is linked to the land tenure systems. In most African countries, land property is customary and associated to traditional rules. In some other countries, like Ethiopia, land is nationalized, thus small farmers do not have any right on the land from which they depend for their livelihoods. Many national legal systems centralize control over land and undermine or fail to legally recognize the land rights of local landholders. This lack of legal protection is one of the “un-freedoms” that makes the path towards development increasingly difficult.  
- Furthermore, the international trade and investment regime provides robust legal protection to international investors, while fewer and less affective international arrangements have been established to protect the rights of the rural poor or to ensure that greater trade and investment translate into inclusive, sustainable development and poverty reduction.
- Additionally, the “land grabbing” phenomenon is deeply integrated in the wider context of globalization, population growth and increased global commercial pressure on land. So, food or biofuel production are hard to separate analytically from wider trends of increasing commercial pressure on land characterized by a more diverse range of actors, scales, and economic drivers. They are part of a longer-term historical process of economic and social transformation. Consequently, it is difficult to determine a unique policy strategic approach.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my personal experience I can say that &#8220;large scale land acquisitions&#8221; are surely related to weak democratic institutions that lead to corruption without protecting the local communities’ rights on land from which they belong. Despite advances in democratization around the world, huge deficits of transparency, accountability, and popular empowerment exist and contribute to elite capture of resources.</p>
<p>&#8211; In addition, another determining element is linked to the land tenure systems. In most African countries, land property is customary and associated to traditional rules. In some other countries, like Ethiopia, land is nationalized, thus small farmers do not have any right on the land from which they depend for their livelihoods. Many national legal systems centralize control over land and undermine or fail to legally recognize the land rights of local landholders. This lack of legal protection is one of the “un-freedoms” that makes the path towards development increasingly difficult.<br />
&#8211; Furthermore, the international trade and investment regime provides robust legal protection to international investors, while fewer and less affective international arrangements have been established to protect the rights of the rural poor or to ensure that greater trade and investment translate into inclusive, sustainable development and poverty reduction.<br />
&#8211; Additionally, the “land grabbing” phenomenon is deeply integrated in the wider context of globalization, population growth and increased global commercial pressure on land. So, food or biofuel production are hard to separate analytically from wider trends of increasing commercial pressure on land characterized by a more diverse range of actors, scales, and economic drivers. They are part of a longer-term historical process of economic and social transformation. Consequently, it is difficult to determine a unique policy strategic approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
