<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can 17th Century Britain help us design better social protection?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/can-17th-century-britain-help-us-design-better-social-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/can-17th-century-britain-help-us-design-better-social-protection/</link>
	<description>How active citizens and effective states can change the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2017 03:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/can-17th-century-britain-help-us-design-better-social-protection/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=160#comment-219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Duncan, 

Really interesting stuff - always though social security began after the war, fascinating to realise there was such a precedent.

I wander if there&#039;s anything to learn from current state of UK welfare system? A few quick thoughts...

- social security has to be accompanied by decent labour laws - http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/02/tacking-poverty-means-tackling-casual-jobs/

- otherwise it can act as a trap. It&#039;s got to provide enough, be flexible and responsive - http://www.oxfam.org.uk/applications/blogs/ukpp/2009/02/could_you_live_on_60_per_week.html

- rather than coercive and demeaning - http://www.oxfam.org.uk/applications/blogs/ukpp/2008/12/welfare_reform_the_wrong_appro.html

I&#039;m sure there&#039;s more...

Will]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Duncan, </p>
<p>Really interesting stuff &#8211; always though social security began after the war, fascinating to realise there was such a precedent.</p>
<p>I wander if there&#8217;s anything to learn from current state of UK welfare system? A few quick thoughts&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8211; social security has to be accompanied by decent labour laws &#8211; <a href="http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/02/tacking-poverty-means-tackling-casual-jobs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/02/tacking-poverty-means-tackling-casual-jobs/</a></p>
<p>&#8211; otherwise it can act as a trap. It&#8217;s got to provide enough, be flexible and responsive &#8211; <a href="http://www.oxfam.org.uk/applications/blogs/ukpp/2009/02/could_you_live_on_60_per_week.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.oxfam.org.uk/applications/blogs/ukpp/2009/02/could_you_live_on_60_per_week.html</a></p>
<p>&#8211; rather than coercive and demeaning &#8211; <a href="http://www.oxfam.org.uk/applications/blogs/ukpp/2008/12/welfare_reform_the_wrong_appro.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.oxfam.org.uk/applications/blogs/ukpp/2008/12/welfare_reform_the_wrong_appro.html</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s more&#8230;</p>
<p>Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
