Highly Topical Book Review: Plagues and the Paradox of Progress, by Thomas Bollyky

If you want to step back and think more broadly about Coronavirus, the Universe and Everything, you could do worse than start with Plagues and the Paradox of Progress, by Thomas Bollyky, which combined a ‘germ’s eye view’ of human history with some powerful reflections on the challenges that face us over the coming decades.

First the history. The book has that rare quality of making you look at familiar events and issues in a new and unfamiliar light – not least, seeing human history as an ancestral battle between germs and people.

When people moved from hunter gathering to agriculture, the germs celebrated – people living closer together means contagion booms. The rise of the cities delighted the microbes even more. For centuries cities were stews of infection, where life expectancy lagged way behind the supposedly backward countryside.

Fighting the germs spawned many modern institutions – nation states, municipal governments and more recently, global cooperation against epidemics helped forge forms of control and cooperation (quarantine, vaccination, housing reforms, sanitation and safe water) that then became the blueprint for working together on other problems. Charles Tilly said ‘war made the state and the state made war’, but in this reading, it was the germs.

Bollyky provides a fascinating historical typology of disease, with a chapter on the human response to each. He distinguishes between diseases of conquest and colony (smallpox and malaria); diseases of childhood (measles and other respiratory conditions); diseases of settlement (tuberculosis and cholera) and diseases of place (meningitis and other neglected tropical diseases).

Credit: wikimedia commons

Cities were synonymous with squalor and disease, but around the year 1650, there was a turning point. Conditions began to improve, first n European cities, then spreading to the US, Australia and elsewhere. Urbanization took off. The gains preceded the discovery of new treatments – state institutions and public health systems delivered sanitation, reduced overcrowding etc long before the vaccines arrived. Medical technology followed, completing the job. Despite setbacks such as new diseases and epidemics, people started to win the battle against germs. Fast forward to this century and fatal infection in rich countries is a rarity – we worry about other health issues these days.

But what of the poor countries? Bollyky argues that there has been a reversal of the historical order of events: medical technology has outpaced institutional development, with profound implications:

‘The last two decades have brought dramatic reductions in endemic infectious disease and child mortality, but not the improvements in health-care systems, responsive governance and employment opportunities that accompanies those changes in wealthier nations in the past.’

The citizens of Niger are poorer now (GDP per capita) than they were 25 years ago, yet a person born in Niger today can expect to live 14 years longer than someone born in 1990. A combination of aid and medical technology has worked wonders in the poorest countries of the world. One consequence has been the recent phenomenon of poor country megacities – previously, all the large conurbations were in the rich world.

This is all great news obviously – millions of child deaths averted, lifetimes of human suffering avoided. What Bollyky worries about is what awaits the survivors:

Rapid population growth, unprecedented urbanization, and an increase in the share of young adults are straining the capacity of governments and ecosystems while spurring migration, instability and the risk of pandemic diseases and chronic ailments……It is not hard to envision that the next two decades in lower-income nations may be more violent and conflict-filled than the last, reversing some of the great progress that has recently occurred.’

Great Plague of London, 1655. Credit: wikipedia

To prevent this fate, Bollyky has some fairly cursory advice for governments (invest in urban infrastructure, education and health-care). His real target is the aid sector.

He traces health aid’s roots to colonial and military campaigns, which have left a legacy of vertical programmes – ‘crusades’ against one or other disease along the lines of the iconic eradication of smallpox, and then turbocharged by the response to HIV/AIDS. These came at the expense of attention to institutions – health systems and other infrastructure. He contrasts this approach to the more horizontal structures created by China, Costa Rica, Sri Lanka and others, using home-grown low-cost strategies like barefoot doctors rather than pharmaceutical magic bullets.

Plagues and the Paradox of Progress suggests 3 changes of direction for the aid sector:

  • Recast global aid programs from disease-focused goals to more outcome-oriented measures for improving health.
  • Fund data collection and research that advocates and activists need to advance locally inspired change and support local reformers in pressing their governments for better policies.
  • Politicians in the wealthy nations must come to terms with the inconsistencies of their policies on climate change, global health, trade and immigration.

Oh, and the book is beautifully written, packed with great one liners and historical anecdotes. Perfect reading during lockdown.

I’ve written to ask him for his reflections on the historic ramifications of the current pandemic, but he’s probably pretty busy right now. Will let you know if he writes anything…..

Subscribe to our Newsletter

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please see our Privacy Policy.

We use MailChimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to MailChimp for processing. Learn more about MailChimp's privacy practices here.

Comments

2 Responses to “Highly Topical Book Review: Plagues and the Paradox of Progress, by Thomas Bollyky”
  1. Larry Garber

    Thanks for posting the review. The book was published by the Council on Foreign Relations and distributed free to members. Like many, I suspect, I placed on my bookshelf promising to read when “time permitted.” A metaphor for how we prepare for pandemics and similar events, which we treat as black swans until they actually happen. With your book review as a stimulus will now dutifully read Bollyky’s book and reflect on whether it would have made a difference had more policymakers paid attention to the history and recommendations he provides.

  2. Duncan Campbell

    I love the recommendations. Very cogent. And it’s interesting how things just keep circling back to the same issues. How many times have the problems with, and shortcomings of, international development been boiled down to:
    1. Specific issue-oriented is short-term and bad – Outcome-oriented is good, but it’s long-term and thus requires long-term funding that rich democracies refuse to provide (in spite of their own research loudly shouting in their faces that short-term funding is bad).
    2. Fund data collection and research and support local reformers. Um … yes, a thousand times yes … for every and all international development challenges!
    3. Politicians in the wealthy nations must come to terms with the inconsistencies of their policies. Um … YES! But, as both history and current events show, ain’t gonna happen.
    Duncan, do you ever feel like a broken record?

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.