<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is blood and sacrifice enough? The Honduran peasant movement&#039;s model of change</title>
	<atom:link href="https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/what-is-the-honduran-peasant-movements-model-of-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/what-is-the-honduran-peasant-movements-model-of-change/</link>
	<description>How active citizens and effective states can change the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 12:33:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethel Mendez</title>
		<link>https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/what-is-the-honduran-peasant-movements-model-of-change/#comment-3439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ethel Mendez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=9402#comment-3439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting post, but I&#039;m troubled by the suggestion that the activists in el Bajo Aguan have not thought well enough about their strategies... as if they lack creativity or strategic thinking? Rather, there are politics sorrounding this conflict that have not been explored. The fact that the &#039;owner&#039; of this land in Bajo Aguan is one of the wealthiest and most influential Hondurans plays a role, as does the fact that politics, government, business and drugs go hand in hand in the country (i.e.: A recent case proved that it is the police robbing and killing people in Tegucigalpa). The campesinos&#039; isolation and their strategies, or lack thereof, may be better understood in that context.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, but I&#8217;m troubled by the suggestion that the activists in el Bajo Aguan have not thought well enough about their strategies&#8230; as if they lack creativity or strategic thinking? Rather, there are politics sorrounding this conflict that have not been explored. The fact that the &#8216;owner&#8217; of this land in Bajo Aguan is one of the wealthiest and most influential Hondurans plays a role, as does the fact that politics, government, business and drugs go hand in hand in the country (i.e.: A recent case proved that it is the police robbing and killing people in Tegucigalpa). The campesinos&#8217; isolation and their strategies, or lack thereof, may be better understood in that context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augusta Dwyer</title>
		<link>https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/what-is-the-honduran-peasant-movements-model-of-change/#comment-3438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Augusta Dwyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=9402#comment-3438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Duncan, I found this posting very interesting-- and very intriguing. Obviously, the example of this hard-pressed peasant movement  is one that leaves many questions unanswered and deserves more study. Why is it having so little success in winning land rights? How is the movement structured, and what kinds of solutions are their members looking for? Could it try to be more self-sufficient, looking for foreign partners to help fund initiatives, rather than wait for a better government to be elected? In some ways, it reminds me of the Assembly of the Poor in Thailand, a social movement that saw its membership and effectiveness gradually decline as successive Thai governments promised to meet its demands then repeatedly failed to deliver.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan, I found this posting very interesting&#8211; and very intriguing. Obviously, the example of this hard-pressed peasant movement  is one that leaves many questions unanswered and deserves more study. Why is it having so little success in winning land rights? How is the movement structured, and what kinds of solutions are their members looking for? Could it try to be more self-sufficient, looking for foreign partners to help fund initiatives, rather than wait for a better government to be elected? In some ways, it reminds me of the Assembly of the Poor in Thailand, a social movement that saw its membership and effectiveness gradually decline as successive Thai governments promised to meet its demands then repeatedly failed to deliver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
